Legal Opinion

Sikora v. Bauer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1930No. 527PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Generally speaking, the negligence charged against Bauer is that he employed and permitted the boy to perform such service and neglected to keep a lookout for passing automobiles and warn the boy of thé one that killed him or caution him of the dangers incident to such service.

In the charge the court, after defining negligence, instructed the jury to determine whether Bauer was negligent “in any one or all of the particulars complained of in the petition”; the court also charged the jury that Bauer was negligent if he failed to exercise “that degree of care which persons of ordinary care and…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cox v. WaltzOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Helvie v. RattaOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Thomas v. HeerOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Johnson v. HunterOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Stover v. YoakumOhio Court of Appeals · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API