Legal Opinion

Boedker v. warren.E. Richards Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

The contract for the real estate commission in question was signed by Boedker prior to the coming to terms of agreement of sale between Boedker, the seller, and Burckhart, the purchaser. In other words, no offer and acceptance had been made in the instant case and at the time of signing the contract to pay the commission, as was the fact in the Brua case, supra.

Further,, there is some evidence tending to show that the agent took Boedker to see the purchaser after the signing of the commission contract, upon which occasion the sale agreement was effected. The case of Warner v Brua, supra, is…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cox v. WaltzOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API