Grable v. Henderson
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By WASHBURN, PJ.
There was such a conflict in the evidence that a reviewing court would not be justified in setting aside a verdict of a jury for or against either party on the weight of the evidence.
After stating that the plaintiff claimed that the money was loaned to the defendant and that .“the defendant claims that this money was given to her by the plaintiff as a gift, without consideration or any promise to repay the same to him,” the court charged the jury that the burden was upon the plaintiff to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that said money was loaned to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Payne v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Krull v. ArmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
- Judson v. HatchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Burke v. BurkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Cox v. WaltzOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peters v. PapoulacosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Alberts v. DunlaveyOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- Wenz v. HamiltonOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
- Vandyke v. Fisher, 2006 Ca 0007 (9-18-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007