Legal Opinion

Adams v. Union Dime Sav. Bank

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 11, 1943Published

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs sue to recover overtime compensation claimed to be due under Section 7(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 207(a), for varying periods of their employment as building service employees in two loft buildings owned by the defendant, between October 24, 1938 (the effective date of the Act), and February 26, 1942, and for an additional equal amount as liquidated damages, attorneys fee and costs under Section 16(b), 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b). It was stipulated on the trial that the plaintiffs are entitled to recover unless the defendant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Philippine Sugar Estates Development Co. v. Government of the Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Curtis v. . AlbeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Salomon v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Bartelme v. Merced Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API