Legal Opinion

Rea v. Fornan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 4, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Geiger,, J.

The plaintiff below began an action in partition, alleging that he is seized in fee simple of an undivided l/90th of 17 separate tracts of real estate, having inherited the same from the deceased half brother of the plaintiff’s decedent. It is alleged that plaintiff’s decedent died leaving surviving bim certain nieces and nephews, grandnieces and grandnephews as his only heirs and next of kin, whom the petition enumerates in six separate groups. It is alleged that since May 12, 1937 (the date of the death of the decedent, Maurice Patrick Murnan), Grace D. Backenstoe, who claims an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of RedmanOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. LuthyOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Buckeye State Building & Loan Co. v. SchmidtOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Yappel v. MozinaOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. City of Canton v. PrykeOhio Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rea v. FornanOhio Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API