Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. Luthy
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
Counsel for plaintiff in error con tend that the trial court erred in directing a verdict for the plaintiff without first ruling upon the motion of the defendant for a directed verdict, and further erred in not giving the defendant an opportunity to withdraw its motion for a directed verdict, or to request a submission of the cause to the jury, before actually directing the jury to return a verdict for the plaintiff. And that presents the principal question before this court for determination.
The record discloses that upon the several motions being made by counsel for plaintiff and counsel…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Michigan Cent. R.R. Co. v. Spindler, Admr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1937
- Buckeye State Building & Loan Co. v. SchmidtOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. McKimOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
- Yappel v. MozinaOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
- Caple, Admr. v. CraneOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.