Legal Opinion
Bohm v. L.B. Hartz Wholesale Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 9, 1985No. C8-84-1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
Treva Bohm sued L.B. Hartz Wholesale, Inc. for sex discrimination in employment in violation of Minn.Stat. § 363.03, subd. 1(2) (1984). Bohm alleged that she did not receive equal pay for work which was substantially similar to work done by a male employee within her department, that the employment practices of Hartz were discriminatory towards women, and that she was discharged from her employment in retaliation for her complaints of sex discrimination.
While the court concluded that Bohm did not establish unequal pay for equal work, this matter was not appealed. Bohm’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- County of Washington v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- California Brewers Assn. v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rhonda S. Kunferman v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Bohm v. L.B. Hartz Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Rhonda Kunferman v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Rhonda S. Kunferman v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997