Legal Opinion

Bohm v. L.B. Hartz Wholesale Corp.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 9, 1985No. C8-84-1891Published

1Opinion of the Court

370 N.W.2d 901 (1985)

Treva BOHM, Appellant,

v.

L.B. HARTZ WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Respondent.

No. C8-84-1891.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

July 9, 1985.

Review Denied September 26, 1985.

Kenneth P. Griswold, St. Paul, for appellant.

Kurt J. Marben, Thief River Falls, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by WOZNIAK, P.J., and NIERENGARTEN and CRIPPEN, JJ.

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

Treva Bohm sued L.B. Hartz Wholesale, Inc. for sex discrimination in employment in violation of Minn.Stat. § 363.03, subd. 1(2) (1984). Bohm alleged that she did not receive equal pay for work which was substantially…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. County of Washington v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API