Legal Opinion

In the Interest of J. D. G.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 25, 2006No. A05A1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

Fifteen-year-old J. D. G. was charged with possessing marijuana and possessing methamphetamine. He moved to suppress the evidence, asserting that it was procured during an illegal search. The trial court denied the motion, but granted a certificate for immediate review. Finding no error, we affirm.

On appeal from a ruling on a motion to suppress, we construe the evidence most favorably to uphold the findings and judgment of the trial court.1 “[T]he trial court’s findings on disputed facts and credibility are adopted unless they are clearly erroneous.”2 Viewed in this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Satterfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Bond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boykins-White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. In the Interest of T. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. In Re TMCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API