Lawrence v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Judge.
Following a bench trial, Jack Lawrence was convicted of possession of cocaine. On appeal, he challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the cocaine, which he contends was discovered through an unconstitutional search. Because we agree that the search was unconstitutional, we reverse.
In reviewing a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress,
[w]hen the evidence is uncontroverted and no question of witness credibility is presented, the trial court’s application of the law to undisputed facts is subject to de novo appellate review. On issues of mixed questions…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Anthony Elvine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Clay v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
- Craig Trammell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
- Elvine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- State v. CrumptonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010