Legal Opinion
Tyrpak v. Daniels
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 16, 1994No. 59870-3PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
The Port of Camas-Washougal and its commissioners, along with others (hereinafter referred to collec tively as the Port of Camas-Washougal), appeal directly to this court from a superior court decision which held that RCW 53.04.082 is an unconstitutional impairment of contract. This statute permits a less than county-wide port district to annex adjacent territory in another less than county-wide port district if the territory in question is within the limits of a city which forms part of the name of the annexing port district. Respondents the Port of Vancouver, U.S.A., certain individual…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Washington Federation of State Employees v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Retired Public Employees Council v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.