Legal Opinion
Cruz v. Lusk Collection Agency
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 30, 1978No. 2 CA-CIV 2687PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
The issue in this appeal is whether appellees are proscribed from bringing suit on the grounds that they are not the real parties in interest and are not authorized to practice law in the State of Arizona.
The instant case commenced with a complaint for declaratory relief filed in the superior court on August 20,1976, by appellants Cruz to set aside a default judgment taken against them on October 16, 1975 by appellee Lusk Collection Agency. The default judgment had been entered in the justice court based on a claim against the Cruzes which had been assigned by a local…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Celanese Corp. Of America v. John Clark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Cohn v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Certified Collectors, Inc. v. LesnickArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Mosher v. BellasArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Sroufe v. Soto Bros.Arizona Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Marchant v. U.S. Collections West, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1998
- Colorado Casualty Insurance v. Safety Control Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Joel Erik Thompson, Ltd. v. HolderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Grant Road Lumber Co. v. WystrachCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Bustrum v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.