Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Schmelzer

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1990No. 16802PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUBSTITUTE OPINION

The Court’s prior opinion, dated December 1, 1988, is hereby withdrawn.

SWANSTROM, Judge.

This case involves the accounting and winding up of a partnership. Paul and llene Schmelzer appeal from the district court’s amended judgment requiring them to purchase the interest of James and Joan Thomas in a partnership and to compensate the Thomases for net excess contributions during the winding up period. The main issue is whether there was a meeting of the minds to form an agreement calling for the Schmelzers to purchase the Thomases’ partnership interest. Because we find…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Rasmussen v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Summers v. DooleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  4. David Steed & Associates, Inc. v. YoungIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Craig v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Country Cove Development, Inc. v. MayIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Dean Operations, Inc. v. One Seventy AssociatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  3. Griffin v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2016
  4. Huyett v. Idaho State UniversityIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Potts Construction Co. v. North Kootenai Water DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API