Craig v. Hamilton
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Owsley, J.:
Defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving a partnership and settling the rights of the parties. We have concluded this is a fact oase. The findings of the trial court are supported by the evidence and the judgment should be affirmed.
On April 21, 1970, the parties to this action formed a partnership to conduot a construction business. John E. Craig and Raymond L. Carney, d/b/a Carney & Craig Construction Company, filed a petition seeking a declaratory judgment to adjudicate a dispute between the parties, alleging the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Craig v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Armstrong v. City of SalinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Hass v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Matthews v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Smith v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Cantrell v. Amarillo Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- Marcotte Realty & Auction, Inc. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- In Re Adoption of F.A.R.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- Aslin v. SeamonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.