Legal Opinion

Craig v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 22, 1977No. 48,112PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Owsley, J.:

Defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving a partnership and settling the rights of the parties. We have concluded this is a fact oase. The findings of the trial court are supported by the evidence and the judgment should be affirmed.

On April 21, 1970, the parties to this action formed a partnership to conduot a construction business. John E. Craig and Raymond L. Carney, d/b/a Carney & Craig Construction Company, filed a petition seeking a declaratory judgment to adjudicate a dispute between the parties, alleging the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Craig v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Armstrong v. City of SalinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Hass v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Matthews v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. Smith v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. Cantrell v. Amarillo Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  3. Marcotte Realty & Auction, Inc. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  4. In Re Adoption of F.A.R.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Aslin v. SeamonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API