Legal Opinion

State v. . Harris

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ervin, .1.

The defendant moved in arrest of judgment in this Court on the ground that the warrant fails to charge the commission of a crime. Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, Rule 21, 221 N. C. 558; S. v. Jones, 218 N. C. 734, 12 S. E. (2) 292; S. v. Ballangee, 191 N. C. 700, 132 S. E. 795; S. v. Marsh, 132 N. C. 1000, 43 S. E. 828, 67 L. R. A. 179.

It is evident that the draftsman of the criminal pleading under review undertook to charge that the accused is a vagrant within the purview of G.S. 14-336. Lie did not, however, accomplish his purpose because the averments of the complaint do…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. State v. Marsh.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. State v. . BallangeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. State v. . CallettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. GoodmanDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API