Legal Opinion

State v. . Callett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1937PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClakkson, J.

At the close of the State’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence the defendant in the court below made motions to dismiss the action, or for judgment of nonsuit. C. S., 4643. the court below overruled these motions, and in this we think there was error.(1) The defendant was indicted for buggery, under C. S., 4336. After a careful review of the evidence, we do not think it sufficient to have been submitted to the jury. S. v. Goodson, 107 N. C., 798; S. v. Montague, 195 N. C., 20; S. v. Carter, 204 N. C., 304. Under the buggery statute, C. S., 4336, supra, the crime is punishable as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. . GoodsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. State v. . MontagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. State v. . BallangeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. State v. . EfirdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. State v. . GoffneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. CochranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. State v. . EppsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Perkins v. State of North CarolinaDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API