Legal Opinion

Klundt v. Carothers

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1975No. 11684PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal by defendant-appellant Anchor Ranches, Inc. from an order of the district court for a new trial. Following trial, the district court sua sponte ordered a new trial on the basis that it had committed “serious error” at trial in excluding certain evidence.

A district court may, upon its own initiative, grant a new trial for any reason that a new trial could be granted upon motion of a party. I.R.C.P. 59(d). An order granting a new trial is appealable, I.C. § 13-201; however, we have repeatedly held that the granting of a new trial is a matter committed to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Southwest Consolidated Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Messmer v. KerIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Deshazer v. TompkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Walker v. DistlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Clark v. FosterIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Farmer v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Seppi v. BettyIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Murr v. Selag Corp.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Wade Baker & Sons Farms v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API