Legal Opinion
Evary v. E & F Construction Co.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided November 16, 1967No. File 113245PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrillo, J.
The motion of the defendant Hamilton Manufacturing Company, Inc., hereinafter called the defendant, for a summary judgment is concerned with the applicability of § 31-291 of the General Statutes, the so-called principal employer section of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1 with relation to the facts set forth in the complaint, the affidavit of the defendant, and its special defense. Practice Book § 303.
The complaint alleges (a) that the plaintiff was an employee of the Kelly Maintenance Company, which was engaged to clean a building known as Kline Science Center; (b) Kline Science Center was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Palumbo v. George A. Fuller Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- New Haven Metal & Heating Supply Co. v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Crisanti v. Cremo Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Bates v. Connecticut Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maislin v. LawtonConnecticut Superior Court · 1973
- Ginda v. Northeast Utilities, No. Cv 90-0438223s (Mar. 6, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
- Maislin v. LawtonPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1973
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1973