Legal Opinion
Bates v. Connecticut Power Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 7, 1943PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The plaintiff brought suit for damages for the death of his intestate. The defendant pleaded that the injury was within the Compensation Act. The court held the defense insufficient and gave judgment for the plaintiff. The question to be decided is whether the accident hereinafter described occurred in, on or about premises under the control of the defendant under the provisions of General Statutes, § 5230.
The finding, summarized in so far as is necessary to dispose of the single question of law, was based on a stipulation signed by the parties. On March 6, 1941, the defendant was a public…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Palumbo v. George A. Fuller Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Bello v. NotkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Tierney ex rel. Tierney v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Doherty's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Ross v. Post Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Grant v. BassmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Panaroni v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Traders & General InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Spring Brook Farm Dairy, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Crisanti v. Cremo Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.