Legal Opinion

in Re Schwein Estate

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 2016No. Docket 324305PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGadola, J.

This case implicates the procedural requirements under the Estates and Protected Individu als Code (EPIC), MCL 700.1101 et seq., and the Michigan Court Rules for a personal representative to assert a claim against the estate when the claim arose before the decedent’s death. Respondents appeal as of right the probate court’s opinion and order concluding that (1) personal representative Sandy Mead’s claim against the estate for reimbursement of attendant care services she provided to decedent before his death was not barred by MCL 700.3803(1), MCL 700.3804(3), or MCR 5.307(D), (2) Mead overcame…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Public Citizen v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Joseph v. Auto Club Insurance AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  4. People v. TennysonMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  5. University of Michigan Regents v. Titan Ins AgencyMichigan Supreme Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Keith J Mitan v. Farmington Square Condominium AssociationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API