Legal Opinion

People v. Tennyson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 2010No. Docket 137755PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.

We granted oral argument to consider whether evidence that a child was present in a home in which defendant was in possession of drugs and firearms is, by itself, legally sufficient to support defendant’s conviction under MCL 750.145 for doing an act that “tended to cause a minor child to become neglected or delinquent so as to tend to come under the jurisdiction of” the family division of the circuit court. We hold on the facts of this case — where there is no evidence that the child was aware of such drugs or firearms— that there is insufficient evidence to support defendant’s conviction…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Public Citizen v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. People v. BabcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. LukityMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. People v. Smith-AnthonyMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. PinkneyMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  3. People v. LewisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Ibarra v. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  5. People v. LaidlerMichigan Supreme Court · 2012

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API