Legal Opinion

Coleman-Nichols v. Tixon Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1994No. Docket 145235PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, J.

Defendants appeal by leave granted from a November 1, 1991, order of the trial court granting defendants partial summary disposition but denying summary disposition with regard to the balance of plaintiffs claims. Plaintiff cross appeals from the trial court’s refusal to grant entry of a default judgment based on defendants’ alleged failure to cooperate in discovery. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

This case arises out of plaintiffs employment relationship with Tixon Corporation, of which William Herbert was general manager, and his wife, Armanda Herbert, was president. Tixon was in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rowe v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Adkins v. Thomas Solvent Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Rood v. General Dynamics Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Feaheny v. CaldwellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People v. HerbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Downey v. Charlevoix County BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Nieves v. Bell Industries, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Royce v. Citizens InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Sharper Image Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Schellenberg v. Rochester, Michigan, Lodge No 2225 of the Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the United States of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API