Legal Opinion

Nieves v. Bell Industries, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1994No. Docket 140379PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackenzie, J.

This is an action for wrongful discharge and misrepresentation. Defendants appeal by leave granted from an order denying their motion for summary disposition. We reverse.

Plaintiff interviewed with defendant David Lerner for the position of general manager of defendant Bell Industries’ Ann Arbor office in May 1988. According to plaintiff, Lerner offered assurances that the position was "long-term” and assured plaintiff that he would not be arbitrarily fired. The following day, Lerner called plaintiff to offer him the position, and plaintiff asked if defendants would be willing to make a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rowe v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Rood v. General Dynamics Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Schwartz v. Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Scholz v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Titan Insurance Company v. HytenMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Novak v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Zaremba Equipment, Inc. v. Harco National InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Cooper v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2008

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API