Legal Opinion
In re Unnamed Attorney
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 31, 1991No. 87-485Published
1Per curiam
Respondent, an attorney admitted to practice in this Court, has moved to quash an investigative subpoena issued by the clerk of this Court on the application of the chair of the Professional Conduct Board. We grant the motion to quash with the proviso that the subpoena may be reissued consistent with this opinion.
The subpoena was issued pursuant to § 7(f) of the Permanent Rules Governing Establishment of Professional Conduct Board *566and Its Operation, Administrative Order No. 9, as it existed prior to the 1989 amendment. It provided:(f) The chairman of the Board, or of any hearing panel, shall…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Miss. State Bar v. ATTORNEY-RESPONDENT, ETC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1979
- Diamond v. VickreySupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
- Unnamed Attorney v. Attorney Grievance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- North Carolina State Bar v. SpeckmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.