Legal Opinion
Miss. State Bar v. ATTORNEY-RESPONDENT, ETC.
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1979No. Misc. No. 884PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
367 So.2d 179 (1979)
MISSISSIPPI STATE BAR
v.
ATTORNEY-RESPONDENT[1] IN DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS.
Misc. No. 884.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
January 31, 1979.
Jimmy L. Miller, Jackson, for appellant.
No Name of attorney to be reported for the attorney-respondent.
En Banc.
ON MOTION TO QUASH SUMMONS AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
WALKER, Justice, for the Court:
This is on motion to quash a summons and subpoena duces tecum. The summons and subpoena duces tecum were issued by the complaint counsel of the Mississippi State Bar pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated section 73-3-307 (Supp. 1978). This statute…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Cohen v. HurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- In re KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Levi v. Mississippi State BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
- Netterville v. Mississippi State BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1981
- Mississippi State Bar v. ATTORNEY LMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. RussellMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Asher v. Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.