Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hildenbrand

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided July 17, 1995No. 89-K-535PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT

KANE, Senior District Judge.

Before me is another in a continuing procession of cases that arose when the combination of sciolistic laissez faire banking policy and individual greed produced the savings and loan debacle of the late 1980’s and early 1990’s. During that time hundreds of banks, including Key Savings & Loan (“Key S & L”), folded when risky loans went bad in a period of economic downturn. Since then federal regulators have engaged in Procrustean exercises to bring to the bar not only the wolves…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Jack W. SavageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,889 Robert Abrahamson and Marjorie Abrahamson v. Malcolm K. FleschnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  3. Major v. BentonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. M.M. v. ZavarasDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1996
  2. Procter & Gamble Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1996
  3. Lehman Bros. Commercial v. Minmetals International Non-Ferrous Metals Trading Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  4. University of Colorado Foundation, Inc. v. American CyanamidDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995
  5. George Carlson & Associates v. United States Bankruptcy Court (In Re Zamora)District Court, D. Colorado · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API