Legal Opinion

M.M. v. Zavaras

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided September 17, 1996No. 1:96-cv-02010PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KANE, District Judge.

This putative civil action is before me for consideration of a Motion To Reconsider filed on behalf of an unnamed plaintiff by three attorneys associated with the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado and the Center for Reproductive Law and Policy asking me to reconsider my denial of a “Motion for Leave to Proceed in Pseudonym.” Accompanying the Motion is a “Memorandum In Support Of Motion To Reconsider.” The deficiencies in both are such that neither is well taken.

Counsel are deemed to know the Local Rules of Practice for this court.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Major v. BentonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  2. Doe v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1982
  3. Houston v. Mile High Adventist AcademyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1994
  4. Lorenz v. United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1981
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. HildenbrandDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. General Steel Domestic Sales, LLC v. ChumleyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2015
  2. Doe v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2003
  3. Boatman v. United States Racquetball Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2014
  4. Wollan v. United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
  5. Western Convenience Stores, Inc. v. Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API