Legal Opinion
University of Colorado Foundation, Inc. v. American Cyanamid
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided October 26, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-K-1657PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
KANE, Senior District Judge.
In this action, The University of Colorado Foundation, Inc. (“Foundation”), The University of Colorado (“University”), The Regents of the University of Colorado (“Regents”), Robert H. Allen and Paul A. Seligman (collectively “Plaintiffs”) allege Defendant American Cyanamid Company (“Cyanamid”) wrongfully filed and obtained a patent on a reformulated prescription prenatal vitamin called “Materna.”
In its second amended complaint, Plaintiffs claimed relief for (1) conversion, (2) fraud, (3) wrongful naming of inventor, (4) copyright…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Becher v. Contoure Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Arachnid, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Merit Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Kennedy v. HazeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Saco-Lowell Shops v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- University of Colorado Foundation, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1997
- University of Colorado Foundation, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- University of Colorado Foundation, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2000
- University of Colorado Foundation, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2002
- University of Colorado Foundation, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.