Legal Opinion

Kuzemka v. Gregory

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 17, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

The finding shows no substantial disagreement of the parties upon the following facts. On June 18th, 1927, the plaintiff purchased an automobile from the defendant for $1,210 and received credit for $25 then paid in cash and $300 for his old car which was delivered to the defendant. He then executed a conditional bill of sale in the form commonly used in this State providing for an additional cash payment to the defendant of $100 on July 1st, 1927, and “$785 to be paid in monthly payments of $45 each with six per cent interest,” arid the plaintiff was given possession of the new car, the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barker v. Lewis Storage & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  2. Curtis v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
  3. Sanford v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  4. Wood v. HolahSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  5. Lovell v. Hammond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Canaan Oil & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Plikus v. PlikusConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  3. New Britain Real Estate & Title Co. v. Hartford Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  4. Epstein v. Automatic EnterprisesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  5. Giuliano Construction Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API