Legal Opinion
New Britain Real Estate & Title Co. v. Hartford Acceptance Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 5, 1931PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
On or about November 9th, 1926, the Burritt Motor Sales & Service Company sold an automobile to Ocial Cox, whó gave a note for the unpaid balance of the purchase price, payable in monthly instalments, and the parties executed an instrument entitled “conditional sale contract,” designated in this action as Exhibit B. This note and contract were assigned by the Burritt Company to the plaintiff and the latter, in consideration thereof, advanced $521.52 to the Burritt Company. The contract and assignment were recorded in the town clerk’s office in New Britain, where all the parties were located.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coleman v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- In re Wilcox & Howe Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- State Bank v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Gilbert v. WalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Lynn Morris Plan Co. v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Saporiti v. Austin A. Chambers Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Hansel v. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Grote v. A. C. Hine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Budget Plan, Inc. v. SavoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Shaw v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.