Legal Opinion
Plikus v. Plikus
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 19, 1991No. 9336PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
In this action for conversion of assets,1 the defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court accepting the report of the attorney trial referee and ruling in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) limited his discretion as the custodial parent, (2) disallowed a claimed credit, (3) ordered a reconveyance of the stock at issue, (4) imposed on him an obligation to support the plaintiff beyond the age of eighteen, (5) found a portion of his divorce agreement to be for the benefit of the plaintiff, and (6) awarded attorney’s fees to the plaintiff.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gionfriddo v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Canaan Oil & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Nor'easter Group, Inc. v. Colossale Concrete, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Markey v. SantangeloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Cohen v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. GuckianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- United Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Progress Builders, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Farrell v. FarrellConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Oakley v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- City of Stamford v. KovacConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.