Legal Opinion
Epstein v. Automatic Enterprises
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 18, 1986No. 3408PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The plaintiff brought suit against the defendants, several corporations and two individuals, in three counts claiming conversion, breach of contract *485and unjust enrichment. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on the conversion count in the amount of $77,215.83 and on the unjust enrichment count in the amount of $3500. The jury returned a defendants’ verdict on the contract count. The defendants thereafter filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict in accordance with their prior motion for a directed verdict and motion to set aside the verdict. The individual…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coleman v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Barker v. Lewis Storage & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Falker v. SamperiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Kosko v. KohlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- State v. BillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gagne v. VaccaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Luciani v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Penn Electric Supply Co. v. Billows Electric Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Stuart & Sons, L.P. v. Curtis Publishing Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- 3N International, Inc. v. Carrano (In re Carrano)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.