Beals v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
The primary question raised in this case is whether I. J. Beals, the claimant, was at the time of an accident an employee of the Brookdale Coal Company as that term is used in the Workmen’s Compensation Act, or an independent contractor.
A referee found that Beals was not an employee of the defendant but that his work was casual in character and not in the regular course of the employer’s business.
A re-hearing was ordered by the board and another referee awarded compensation for total disability, holding that the claimant was not an independent contractor. On appeal the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- McColligan v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Ford v. A. E. Dick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Kelley v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Smith v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Healey v. Carey, Baxter & Kennedy, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Michetti v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Cochrane v. William Penn HotelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- McCalbe v. Timothy Shanahan & SonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Bradley v. Chester Materials Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.