Legal Opinion
State v. . Ingle
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 12, 1938PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
It is provided by cb. 52, Public Laws 1931, sec. 6, that in. cities of more than thirty-five hundred inhabitants, persons, firms or corporations desiring to enter into or carry on “the Plumbing and/or Heating Contracting business,” shall first apply to the State Board of Examiners of Plumbing and Heating Contractors for examination and license, at least thirty days prior to “engaging in said business.”
In section 8, it is provided that the board shall have power to revoke the license of any “Plumbing and/or Heating Contractor,” who, after hearing, is found to be guilty of any fraud or deceit…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- Roach v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- State v. . Van DoranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- State v. . WhitehurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Muse v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State ex rel. Employment Security Commission v. KermonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.