People v. Stewart
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Colusa County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
The appellant was convicted of an assault with intent to commit rape, and now insists that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. Like a great majority of this class of cases, the facts here relied upon to support a conviction are largely dependent upon the testimony of the prosecuting witness alone; still, this court has repeatedly held that the testimony of the prosecutrix may be sufficient of itself to establish a prima facie case.
The alleged assault occurred in the night-time, while the parties were traveling upon a public highway; and after detailing certain language that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. MayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- State v. RichardsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- State v. ShettleworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- People v. TierneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. MeichtryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. ClabornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. LambertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.