People v. Lambert
California Supreme Court
APPEAL írom a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County and from an order denying a new trial. J. M. Man-non, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Information for the crime of rape, alleged to have been committed by defendant upon the person of his daughter, Mary Lambert, about November 15, 1896; she was then seventeen years old. Defendant was convicted and sen*172tenced to life imprisonment. The appeal is from the judgment and order denying a new trial. Appellant specifies numerous errors of the court in admitting and excluding evidence and in giving instructions, and that the evidence was insufficient to justify the verdict. The evidence relating to the circumstances connected with the alleged act is confined to that of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. MayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. DevineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. WesselCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. HurlburtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People v. Ye FooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- State v. GriffinWashington Supreme Court · 1906
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.