Legal Opinion

People v. Meichtry

California Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1951No. Crim. 5195PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The defendant appealed from a judgment entered on a verdict of guilty of assault with intent to commit rape. He questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support the implied finding that he had the intent as charged. He also claims that there was prejudicial error in the giving of instructions and that he was prevented from having a fair trial by asserted misconduct of the district attorney. He seeks a reversal of the judgment or a reduction of the degree of the crime to that of simple assault.

The information charged that the defendant committed the crime of assault with intent to commit…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People v. NorringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. People v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. People v. CarothersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. KirkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People v. RosotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API