Budkiewicz v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEmmert, J.
This appeal is here by reason of four judges of the Appellate Court failing to concur. Section 4-209, Burns’ 1946 Replacement. It is from a judgment entered for appellee because appellant refused to amend his complaint after a demurrer for want of facts had been sustained thereto.
The complaint is for personal injuries sustained by appellant when his automobile collided with a freight train operated by appellee at a place where the railroad crossed Indiana Highway No. 149 at grade. The crossing was unlighted, not protected by gates, flasher lights or any other mechanical warning device, but…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Domestic Block Coal Co. v. DeArmeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Opple v. RayIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
- Lindley v. SinkIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
- Lincoln Operating Co. v. GillisIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. HussIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- RUST v. WatsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- Central Indiana Railway Co. v. Anderson Banking Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Jerome C. Hartzler v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Stevens v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Baker v. GordonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.