Baucom's Nursery v. Mecklenburg County
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Plaintiff previously instituted an action against defendant County and its commissioners involving an interpretation of this same zoning ordinance as it was written before the 6 December 1982 amendment. See Baucom’s Nursery Co. v. Mecklenburg Co., 62 N.C. App. 396, 303 S.E. 2d 236 (1983). Before this Court filed its opinion in the prior case, the ordinance, which was then the subject of litigation, was amended. This amended ordinance is the subject of the present controversy.
Plaintiff assigns as error (1) the trial court’s conclusion that there is no genuine issue of material…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Rorrer v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Sherrill v. Town of Wrightsville BeachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Marshburn v. AssociatEd Indemnity Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hare v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Slade v. VernonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Wood v. North Carolina State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- EEE-ZZZ Lay Drain Co. v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Crain v. ButlerDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.