Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Cescon

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 22, 1973No. Patent Appeal No. 8884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals sustaining rejections of claims 1, 2, 4, 5 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 and claims 1, 41-44 and 51 under 35 U.S.C. § 112' of appellant’s application serial No. 622,085, filed March 10, 1967, for “Phototropic 2, 4, 5-Tri-phenylimidazolyl Radicals and Dimers Thereof.” 1 We reverse.

The Invention

The invention relates to novel photo-dissociable, substantially colorless imida-zolyl dimers and colored radicals formed therefrom under light stimulation. Claim 1 is illustrative:

1. A composition of matter selected from the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of Aubrey A. LarsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  3. Application of Robert E. Moore and Edward J. JanoskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  4. Application of Arthur F. Wagner and Karl A. FolkersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Huai-Hung KaoCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Foster Grant Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  3. In re ArmbrusterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  4. McNeil-PPC, Inc. v. Perrigo Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. Ab Iro v. Otex, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API