Intermountain Insurance Service of Vail, Ltd. Liability Co. v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
R filed a motion to vacate the Court's prior decision and a motion to reconsider the Court's prior opinion. R's motions are premised on the retroactive application of temporary regulations issued after the Court issued its opinion and entered its decision. Held: R's motions to reconsider and to vacate will be denied.
1Concurrence
Halpern and Holmes, JJ.,
concurring in the result only:
I. Introduction
Respondent asks that, “in the interests of justice”, we vacate our order and decision so that we may reconsider our opinion “to correct a substantial error of law” resulting from the “unusual circumstance” of the Secretary’s issuing temporary regulations ostensibly overruling the authority on which we relied 23 days earlier in deciding this case.1 Understandably, petitioner cries foul, arguing first and foremost that respondent cannot meet the high standards established by this Court for granting either a motion to vacate,…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.