Legal Opinion

Hodo v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1929No. A-6376PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted in the district court of Kay county for obtaining illicit connection with Veril McMasters under a promise of marriage by the defendant to the said Veril McMasters, which said promise was not fulfilled, the said defendant having failed and refused to marry the said Veril McMasters, and not now being the husband of the said Vteril McMasters, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $500. Motion for new trial was filed and overruled, and defendant excepted and appeals to this court.

The testimony on behalf of the state is, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. TimmensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
  2. Corliss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Dickinson v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Lamm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Cluck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Melton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API