Legal Opinion
United States v. Dale, David M.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 14, 1998No. 97-3023PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed PER CURIAM.
Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON.
2Per curiam
Appellant David M. Dale invokes the federal habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2255,1 to challenge his fraud and conspiracy convictions on the ground that under United States v. Gaudin, 515 U.S. 506, 115 S.Ct. 2810, 132 L.Ed.2d 444 (1995), issued after Dale’s convictions became final, the district court erroneously decided as a question of law, rather than remitting to the jury as a question of fact, the materiality of misrepresentations for which Dale was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C.…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. John C. Mandanici, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Pettigrew, CraigCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Earl Richmond, Jr. v. Marvin L. Polk, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Rippo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- United States v. Harold Cunningham and Percy BarronCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.