Legal Opinion
Earl v. Taylor
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 2, 2021No. 1:20-cv-01355Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND DARNELL EARL □□ Plaintiff, * v. OFFICER MARCUS TAYLOR, et al. * Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-01355-CCB canes MEMORANDUM Pending before the court is a motion to dismiss brought by former Baltimore Police Department (“BPD”) Officers Marcus Taylor, Evodio Hendrix, and Wayne Jenkins. The motion is fully briefed, and no oral argument is necessary. See Local Rule 105.6 (D. Md. 2021). For the reasons that follow, the court will grant in part and deny in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss. . BACKGROUND This litigation arises…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bizzie Walters v. Todd McMahenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States Ex Rel. Nathan v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Burnett v. GrattanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.