Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Eagleeye Asset Management, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 4, 2013No. Civil Action No. 11-11576-WGYPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*153 MEMORANDUM
YOUNG, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case illustrates the value of a jury-trial in an adjudicatory system apparently devoted almost entirely to efficiency. Its broad outlines are briefly limned. The well-prepared plaintiff brought a motion for summary judgment. Its outcome was all but a foregone conclusion and it was supported by a decision in this district in closely analogous circumstances. This Court denied summary judgment. A costly and inefficient (at least compared to summary judgment) nine-day jury trial ensued. The jury returned a carefully nuanced verdict that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Nutmeg Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Laumann v. National Hockey LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.