In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
*110 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
I did not try this case very well. I did try it fairly. As the Supreme Court has recognized, “a litigant is entitled to a fair trial but not a perfect one.” McDonough Power Equip., Inc. v. Greenwood, 464 U.S. 548, 553,104 S.Ct. 845, 78 L.Ed.2d 663 (1984) (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted); see also Kyle v. United States, 297 F.2d 507, 514 (2d Cir.1961) (Friendly, J.) (noting that “the interest in obtaining an ideal trial ... may be outweighed by the interest in 'avoiding a retrial unlikely to have a different outcome”).…
2Cases cited98 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Sales Co. v. AstraZeneca LPCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Tyler v. Michaels Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Nowak v. Pennsylvania Professional Soccer, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Cellinfo, LLC v. Am. Tower Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- CellInfo, LLC v. American Tower CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.