Legal Opinion

Luttrell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 24, 1989No. 6 Div. 407PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMillan, judge.

The appellant was convicted of violating the Alabama Uniform Controlled Substances Act, specifically for possessing Dilaudid. He was sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment and was fined $100,000. Although the appellant has raised three issues on appeal, because one of them requires a reversal, the remaining two issues will not be discussed.

Investigator William F. Batson, of the Alabama Bureau of Investigation Narcotics Division, testified that he received information that the appellant had been involved in fraudulent prescriptions, in that he was either writing the prescriptions…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States v. Miguel Angel RecaldeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. Bradley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. McMillian v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1995
  3. W.T.J. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  4. Ex Parte MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Terry Kent Ringstaff v. Dale Howard and the Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Don SiegelmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API