Legal Opinion

McMillian v. Johnson

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided January 17, 1995No. CV-93-A-699-NPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ALBRITTON, District Judge.

This cause is now before the court on the Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Tom Tate (“Tate”), Larry Ikner (“Ikner”), Simon Benson (“Benson”), Mike Barnett (“Barnett”), Morris Thigpen (“Thigpen”), Tom Allen (“Allen”), Marian Shinbaum (“Shinbaum”), W.E. Johnson (“Johnson”), and Charlie Jones (“Jones”). 1 For the reasons stated below, the court finds that the Motions for Summary Judgment are due to be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Walter McMillian (“McMillian”) filed this suit in this court on June…

2Cases cited120 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. McMillian v. Monroe CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Kelly v. SernaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Ex Parte Flexible Products Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. Chiketta Tinker v. Perry BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Chapman Nursing Home, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API