Legal Opinion

Woodward v. Dietrich

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1988No. 978PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this case we are called upon to determine whether a party may be held liable for damages proximately resulting from a person’s reasonable reliance on fraudulent misrepresentations, despite the fact that such a person had no privity with the party making the misrepresentations and was not specifically intended to rely on the misrepresentations, when the reliance was nonetheless specially foreseeable. We find that such a cause of action may be recognized so long as under the particular circumstances of the case presented the liability to be recognized is not indefinite as to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. PAPIEVES Et Ux. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Ernst & Young, L.L.P. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Gibbs v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Harold Katz and Ruth Katz v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. Nina Michael v. Shiley, Inc. Hospital Products Group, Inc., (Formerly Howmedica, Inc.) Pfizer, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. Valley Forge Towers South Condominium v. Ron-Ike Foam Insulators, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API