Legal Opinion
Ultrapure Systems, Inc. v. Ham-Let Group
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 3, 1996No. Civil 95-20706 SWPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING ULTRAPURE’S APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BASED ON TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT; SETTING EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICE CLAIM; DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS ONE AND SEVEN OF THE COMPLAINT
SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ultrapure Systems, Inc. (“Ultra-pure”) brought this action against Defendants HAM-LET Group, Ltd. (“HAMLET”), HTC Ltd. (“HTC”), Hi-Tech Components, Inc., Kinetic Systems, Inc. (“Kinetic”), High Purity Supplies, Inc. (“High Purity”), and Components Gaz Mieroelectronique Internationale (“CGMI”) for trademark…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Durning v. First Boston Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Quabaug Rubber Company v. Fabiano Shoe Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Nutri/system, Inc. v. Con-Stan Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Telebrands Corp. v. Del Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- National Licensing Ass'n v. Inland Joseph Fruit Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 2004
- Nova Wines, Inc. v. Adler Fels Winery LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Gruen Marketing Corp. v. Benrus Watch Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Glow Industries, Inc. v. LopezDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.